There are three motivations for murder: passion (heat of the moment), compulsion (basically madness) and greed (for power, money or something else). Not one single gun law was ever capable of taming or eliminating from existence any one of those three motivations.
Private citizens have managed to control their own guns just fine, with both hands, pursuant to USC Title 10 subtitle A Part I Chapter B section 311(2). They provide themselves better training for the defense of their own lives and property than the government ever could. Aside from the vast majority of Americans being part of, near, around, related to, and in many cases protected first by the militia, this is why the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
The Second Amendment says:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”
There’s also the Ninth Amendment, which bars government from construing its Constitutional powers to disparage individuals or states from excising any of their rights. It reads:
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people”
The Tenth Amendment then shackles the federal government from using any power not specifically delegated to it by the remainder of the document. It reads:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”
Arguments on caselaw are restricted to those issues raised in the trial court based on the facts shown and proven, also in the trial court.
I’m not going to support any restriction on the right to keep and bear arms – not now, not ever. The fact that a right is misused by some is not a valid reason to abridge or limit it for all.